Positive Reproduction: Quality vs Quantity
Originally written 22 March 2021 on Gab
You can't help how you were born, but you can help what you do with your own life. There are many things in life that are, and always will be, out of your control, but your actions will always belong to you, and you alone.
People can't help being born sick or weak due to inherited genetic conditions. The shame and blame belongs entirely to the selfish and irresponsible parents for forcing a lifetime of sickness, weakness, and suffering onto innocent and helpless offspring.
However, now that you're here in this world, if you do suffer from inherited sickness, weakness, and suffering, you can choose to be more honorable than your own parents, and refuse to perpetuate your suffering in the innocent and helpless bodies of as-of-yet unborn generations. You can make the sacrifice which will make the world a healthier, stronger, and more beautiful place, a place with less suffering, by selflessly refraining from having children of your own.
On the inverse side, if you are of exceptional health and strength, it is your absolutely duty to have as many children as you safely can. You too have sacrifices to make, sacrifices of time, money, and pursuit of selfish indulgences.
Just because you were born with exceptional genetic quality, that doesn't automatically make you good and admirable. It certainly doesn't make you honorable. No, you only earn those titles once you've proven it by the sacrifices you're willing to make.
It is the duty of the healthy and the strong to reproduce their health and strength, so that future generations may suffer less and less, for the only true cure for suffering is strength. And the strongest people are the healthiest.
This is how we makeup for all of the past generations up to this point.
Strong people suffer the least. And the strongest people are the healthiest. Therefore, the healthiest and strongest people must find each other and reproduce their health and strength in the bodies of children who will pave the way for all future generations, future generations that will overcome all unnecessary sickness, weakness, and suffering.
Both the sick and the healthy have their own sacrifices to make, sacrifices which earn them the accolades of honor and selflessness. The sick sacrifice their desire to have children, and the healthy sacrifice self-indulgence.
But this doesn't put the sick and the healthy at odds with one another, no, not in the slightest. Sickly people are not bad people, and they can serve the future of health, strength, and beauty by assisting those families whose obligation it is to have exceptionally large numbers of children. In this way, we still retain our greater racial connection to one another. Both the sick and the healthy serving a future with less and less unnecessary suffering.
As always, these are just my random, disorganized, and incomplete thoughts. You're free to take them or leave them. My mere out-loud thinking is no threat to you, I promise.
Original post - Positive Reproduction on Gab
What happened to your twitter account? Please post more!
ReplyDeleteMy Tiwtter account was terminated back in March of this year. I am not only on Gab - https://gab.com/Nature_and_Race
DeleteI agree people with inheritable (or unknown cause) disabilities should not reproduce, and that reproductive investments/choices in general should be based proportionally on the foreseeable wellbeing of future generations.
ReplyDeleteI also find it unideal that couples have one disabled, including non-inheritable, and one healthy, raising any children in a less able and therefore less stable environment, though a secure and involved extended family may compensate sufficiently so this is less clear-cut. But it's often shown as the ideal "balance," only because the community fails to do this through better means. Similar situation with elders, to best keep them at home, with the question of how to minimize undue burden on the healthy while maintaining social cohesion and taking care of everyone. I would answer with some combination of shared immediate help and specialty home health aids as necessary. Overall we seem to be split up and put together in all the wrong ways.
What are your thoughts on disabled couples? I think it's best for their mental health, helping each other, and making it easier for anyone else who must take care of both. If you agree, what about abortions in the rare event even sterilization prevention fails?
Anyways, it's an interesting topic mostly held as untouchable on all sides, which I find rather indicative of how much it requires touching. I do like hearing discussion, such as yours!